Rugby Coaching Blog | Professional Rugby Advice & Coaching


IRB meeting today on development
November 20, 2008, 12:55 pm
Filed under: Dan Cottrell, ELVs, Rugby Coaching, Rugby Team Management | Tags: , ,

The IRB meet annually to discuss the game. This year’s meeting takes place today and is at the Lensbury Club in London. 

The IRB conference is focused on “development”. This list of topics makes for interesting reading:

  • The effect on the Participation by the Game going open (professional) in 1995 
  • Union strategies used in developing mass participation of the Game
  • Two aspects of development: Growth in participation versus Developing quality participation
  • Should there be a consistent set of Pathway Laws and at what age should IRB Laws be global?
  • The age when a player becomes eligible to play senior Rugby
  • The ideal age for players to commence contact elements of the game (e.g. scrums) and competitive matches
  • The effect the Experimental Law Variations have had on the participation level of the Game
  • What are the arguments for the development of Laws for High Performance/Performance Rugby separately to that of the participation level of the Game?
  • The most effective and consistent way to determine player numbers
  • Key health and safety issues for the participation level of the Game
  • What are the benefits of weight versus age pathways?
  • The inclusion of Rugby Sevens in the Olympics and participation
  • What role should the IRB perform in the areas outlined above?
  • At what age should age grade players be allowed to play professional rugby, and what criteria should be used to determine this entry?
  •  

    Mark Egan, the IRB’s Head of Performance and Development is leading the forum.

    “This forum will explore and debate a broad range of issues and challenges faced by the Unions on the ground. Ultimately, the participants are the practitioners, the people at the coalface of development; the people who help Rugby grow all over the world.”

    “Blueprints will emerge from the debate and some optimal forms of action will be identified. In addition there will be seminars on legal and judicial matters, the Laws of the Game and Playing Regulations, on playing surfaces and clothing, on tournaments and competitions, on training and education, medical as well as development funding.”



    The multicultural world of rugby
    November 19, 2008, 9:12 am
    Filed under: Dan Cottrell, ELVs, Rugby Coaching | Tags: , , , , ,

    Yesterday I read a piece about all the great New Zealand coaches who are not coaching in New Zealand. Robbie Deans and Warren Gatland would be the two highest profile names on that list.

    The same could be said of former All Black players in the rest of the world. Hundreds of top class players leave New Zealand every year.

    6559904

    Nick Evans, former All Black half back, playing for English club, the Harlequins

    Though the All Blacks nearly lost to Munster last night, their reign as THE number one rugby nation continues. These leakages are not terminal nor in the long run, the end of international rugby. 

    The key to all this is nothing to do with national teams. It is about playing rugby. Top class rugby bears little resemblence to rugby in the parks, on the sides of hills or in the dusty flats just out of town.

    However, despite all the training and pressure, the majority of international players are no different to the guys and girls who run out on a Saturday afternoon in all weathers. They have a laugh and a joke like the rest of us, and want to win for themselves as much as for their team.

    What makes things more interesting is the mix of cultures from around the world. No longer are we entrenched in a narrow ways of thinking. Different strokes bring different thoughts. It is fresh, it is vibrant and rugby will grow because of it.

    Having access to this wealth of differences makes my job of writing about rugby a constant joy. The interpretations and changes fashion cause debate and provoke new ideas.

    I welcome this “smaller” world of rugby, and hope that the IRB does not split us into the Northern and Southern Hemispheres with the rule changes.

     



    Rugby referees are rare beasts
    November 17, 2008, 2:58 pm
    Filed under: Dan Cottrell, ELVs, Rugby Refereeing | Tags: , ,

    I have spent the last 72 hours picking my way through some seemingly obscure rulings in the IRB rugby laws.

    At the same time I have watched four internationals and refereed two games of rugby, plus fielded a couple of refereeing questions.

    My conclusion is this. We need rugby referees and we need to look after them.

    A ”rare beast”? They are rare because of the abuse they receive and thus many are leaving the game. And they are beasts for lots of the connatations you would care to put about them, some good, some because we feel sorry for them and some because they are by no means perfect.

    Forget the “bias”, the incompetent, the outmoded and the “non scrum” expert charges. This is why we need to protect the rare beast:

    1. The ELVs are different in different parts of the world. How hard is that for an international referee!

    2. The interpretations of the ELVs are changing every couple of weeks.

    3. The definitions of the breakdown are blurred.

    4. The law enforcers are confused, so what hope the players.

    5. Too many ignorant people make sweeping remarks when they have poor knowledge and understanding of the game.

    6. The error count for players in the game is much bigger than the error count of most referees. The onus is on the referee though should he make even one mistake. Unfair?



    The pros and cons of using international games to coach
    November 10, 2008, 9:59 am
    Filed under: Dan Cottrell, ELVs, Rugby Training | Tags: , , ,

    Can we translate what we see on the TV in international games into meaningful outcomes for our own teams? The simple answer could be no. Especially if you are running an under 8s tag team on a Sunday.

                   

    However there are some pros and cons.

     

    Pros of using international games for your coaching

    Innovation

    Sometimes international teams will use a move you have not seen before. With small modifications you can this same move for your team.

     

    Inspiration

    We all aspire to play for our country or even coach them, and though the moment may have passed many of us by, we can gain much from listening to how the international coaches talk about their teams.

     

    Points of reference

    Using international games as examples is an easy way of helping our players visualise what we mean. A particular tackle or defensive alignment means more if the players have seen it performed at the top level.

     

    Cons of using international games for your coaching 

    Time

    The international teams have so much more time to practise the moves you might see on the TV. You can never have this luxury, so you need to be careful what elements you want to reproduce.

     

    Refereeing differences

    The quality of referees at the top level is different. Techniques that work in an international game may not be acceptable at lower levels because the referees are looking at other priorities.

     

    Quality

    A brilliant move may only work because the teams have the strength, speed and skill to perform them. This also goes for some of the close quarter techniques in rucks. I would especially highlight “sealing” manoeuvres, because the top level players are enormously strong across the shoulders and neck. They can take up very low positions and be far safer from injury that less experienced players.



    ELVs under attack
    October 28, 2008, 1:40 pm
    Filed under: Dan Cottrell, ELVs, Rugby Refereeing | Tags: , ,

    Here is an article from the Times Online website to have a look at.

    THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COIN

     

    REVIEW OF ELV’S (EXPERIMENTAL LAW VARIATIONS)

    By R.J.P.Marks

    I think it is angry, but has some pertinent points.

    http://extras.timesonline.co.uk/elv2.htm

    See what you think!



    IRB referee’s supremo talks about the impact of the ELVs

    Paddy O’Brien is interviewed on the IRB’s Total Rugby programme today.

    Here are some of his answers taken from the IRB website.

    For two and a half months the global game has been played under the Experimental Law Variations. The Southern hemisphere was first to experience the ELVs and still include the laws governing sanctions, but what happens when those same players switch to the Northern-style ELVs for the November tests?

    Is there a problem on the horizon, or are these issues merely a storm in a tea cup? Questions Total Rugby Radio put to IRB referee manager Paddy O’Brien.

    Total Rugby: Looking at some the founding principles behind the ELVs, has the game been ‘given back to the players’?

    Paddy O’Brien:”The players would certainly say that it has. On the statistics we’ve had back so far, on 80 to 90 percent of the ELVs the players say they strongly support them, so despite all the myths out there that people don’t like them, the people who play the game, who are at the end of the day the most important people, they’re telling us yes they love them.”

    TR: What about making the game more entertaining - there’s a lot of kicking in the North at the moment..

    P O’B: “I think there’s a bit of a myth out there that one of our objectives was to make the game more entertaining, which was not the case. That’s up to the players. As for the kicking, the stats show that kicking is no more than it was at Rugby World Cup 2007, in fact it’s down. There’s an average of 51 or 52 kicks in a game and if you go back to the semi finals and final of the World Cup there were 87 kicks per game, so there is a lot of misinformation out there.

    “Sure, there is a lot of kicking and that is down to other reasons. Until the referees really get harsh at refereeing people on their feet at the tackle players will not commit to the breakdown and the only way to break defences is by kicking the ball. The fact that there’s a lot of kicking in games at the moment shouldn’t be put down to the ELVs.”

    TR: We’ve currently got different Laws being used in the South and the North. Could this not be a problem with IRB World Ranking points and Rugby World Cup seedings potentially at stake?

    P O’B: “People get a bit emotional over it but the only difference between the two hemispheres at the moment - and a reminder the NPC and Currie Cup are being played under the 16 ELVs whereas up north it’s 13 - is that instead of being a penalty it’s a free kick as a sanction. That’s the only area.

    (more…)



    Why rugby union will never become rugby league
    October 6, 2008, 9:08 am
    Filed under: Dan Cottrell, ELVs, Rugby News | Tags: , , , , ,

    A little piece of history was made on Saturday. The Bridgend Ravens beat Neath at the Gnoll for the first time since 1982. A Welsh Premiership match with bags of atmosphere, and a sizeable crowd for a wet and windy Saturday afternoon.

     

    Bridgend are perhaps the least financially secure of a league with bridges the gap between the amateur and professional game in Wales. What makes their position even more precarious is news from the Super League. The Celtic Crusaders have won a franchise into Europe’s top level rugby league competition for 2009 and, for the first time, top class rugby league will be played on the fields of Wales.

     

    Wait. Not the first time, because the Millennium Stadium in Cardiff has seen plenty of rugby league finals and one-offs. But now it will be regular games with all the razzmatazz and raw rugby that top league brings.

    (more…)



    ELVs - the never ending experiment

    Rugby coaches around the world are pouring over their tactics and working out whether the new laws have made a significant difference to the game.

    In the Northern Hemisphere, two complaints have made most of the headlines: more kicking and inconsistency at the breakdown.

    Just a moment…

    Inconsistency at the breakdown? That is not talking about an ELV. It is a directive from the IRB for referees to stop “bridging and sealing”. However referees are not controlling this area in the game in the same way. Recently criticism has been aimed at Jonathan Kaplan, the well-respected South African referee in the way he dealt the ruck area in two separate Tri Nations games. “A free for all” said one coach about the last game after he had been very harsh in the previous match. (more…)



    Sealing and bridging: profit and loss

     

    Last week I posted the IRB reminders on the interpretation of the law about “bridging and sealing”. It is not explicitly stated in the law book but here are the rough definitions:

     

    Bridging: forming a bridge with your legs or knees and hands or elbows over the ball.

    Sealing: securing yourself to the tackled player, preventing the opposition grabbing the ball and if driven back, taking the tackled player and ball with you.

     

    Since, in the spirit of the game, players are meant to stay on their feet, any attempt by players who are not on their feet to prevent the ball being contested is illegal.

     

    Market forces have prevailed though. Coaches and players are always seeking ways to profit from the laws.

    (more…)



    Are you worried about the ELVs? The top coaches aren’t

    There has been plenty of confusion and misinformation, plus a number of conspiracy theories about the ELVs. The world’s top coaches see the ELVs as here, an opportunity and are working how to deal with them.

     

    Here is what the top coaches are saying at the moment.

    (more…)