Filed under: Better Rugby Blog Guests, Dan Cottrell | Tags: coaches, Mick Clearly
Mick Clearly of the Daily Telegraph makes some worthy points on our worth.
Barbarians v New Zealand: Let’s have a month without coaches
By Mick Cleary Rugby Last updated: December 4th, 2009
The Baa-Baas are in town and Saturday’s match against the All Blacks will have many appealing things: running, handling, fun, post-match ale, songs and no coaches.
Well, that last bit’s not quite true. Nick Mallet will be fronting the Baa-Baas gig while the usual suspects are in the ABs’ corner. But the reason the Baa-Baas still have an appeal for players is that they are different. Sure, there’s a good few quid in it for them, but it’s a rare chance to mix and mingle, enjoy each other’s company, not be too serious and not be too dogmatic. The coach has a minimal input. And does the rugby suffer ? Does it heck as like.
There are many fine coaches, men ( and women ) who strike the right balance. They teach and they guide, and players learn. But here’s a thought. Let’s give all Premiership coaches a month off. Full pay. Let the players sort it out themselves. And then let’s see what happens. I think we’d be pleasantly surprised. Don’t you ?
Filed under: Dan Cottrell, Rugby News | Tags: IRB, laws, rucks, scrums, tackler
News from the Super 14s and Tri Nations
Here is something from the New Zealand RFU on the latest rulings on the ruck:
SANZAR reviews rucks and scrums – attackers favoured
Both the rights of a tackled player and scrums will be subject to changed conditions in 2010, after meetings with SANZAR officials ensured that the focus on the ruck and the forward engagements will be policed to allow a cleaner game.
The new changes will ensure that the attacking side has the advantage at the tackle area. Essentially the tackler will no longer have carte blanche to steal the ball, and the ball carrier more rights to enable his support to recycle.
It has been agreed that often the tackler wins the penalty in a ruck situation, which is going against the premise of promoting attacking rugby.
At scrum time, poor techniques, questionable tactics and repeated resets have led to a huge increase in time spent on what has become in the eyes of many a vexed set piece.
The International Rugby Board has assessed that 12% of an 80 minute match is spent resetting scrums. This is close to 10 minutes.
Offenders, namely in the front rows, will now be under the direct jurisdiction of the respective countries scrum coaches.
Mike Cron (NZ), Pat Noriega (AUS) and Balie Swart (SA) will now oversee their respective countries franchises/teams.
SANZAR referee’s manager Lyndon Bray spoke to the Dominion Post about making rugby a more open game, and ensuring that more time is spent with ball in play.
“We’ve agreed philosophically to change what the tackler can and can’t do,” Bray said.
“He is doing too much. We’ve allowed, in the evolution of the game, to let him remain in contact with the ball and ball carrier after he leaves his feet and he stays on the ball and jumps up and rips it away.”
This has seen the game develop into a situation where teams are afraid to move the ball wide, for if the ball carrier is isolated, it inevitably leads to a turnover.
“It looks great in the one-on-one scenario, but it’s actually against the law. It creates in the game a repetitive scenario where the ball carrier ends up with no rights because he can’t do anything with the ball.”
“The tackler inevitability gets the penalty which philosophically goes against what we are trying to achieve. We’ve agreed the tackler must release everything when he goes to ground and not hold on as he gets to his feet.”
This will give tackled players more time to place the ball, and will ensure that players not making a clean release after the tackle and getting to their feet will be penalised. However the infringement for holding on will still stand, albeit a potential scavenger needs to follow a specific process.
The days of specialists such as Richie McCaw holding onto a tackler or ball and essentially using that as a counterweight to swing to their feet and attack possession may be over.
Last year referees and coaches met, and planted the idea that the game would benefit with different approaches to key areas.
Key amongst this was ensuring a defending team did not have more rights.
Secondary was ensuring that the scrum was a set piece platform, and not a time consuming minefield that could ultimately deter fans from watching the product.
“We came up collectively with the fact that we had to create a greater ownership for changes in behaviour and essentially that was around the technique used at the tackle and at scrum time,” Bray said.
“We agreed that if we carried on doing the workshops we had in the past and came up with decisions on the run that the onus always came back to the guy in the middle with the whistle. We decided that wasn’t going to cut the mustard for 2010. We said we had to listen to the criticism of where our game is at and we have to produce a cleaner and more attractive spectacle.”
“If our reason for existence is to have one of the best competitions in world rugby then we have to recreate time and space on the field and recreate the attack with confidence that we used to have in Super 14 … it means more control from the ball carrier and more control for the attacking team.”
Changes in the scrum will take a more direct tact.
Offending players will be scrutinised and approached. If they cannot remedy their approach, then they will essentially be publically exposed.
“If the Hurricanes scrum for example have poor technique or use a poor tactical technique in week one to disrupt the scrum we will be going in privately and saying you have a problem and we will use Mike Cron to deliver the message, which gives it teeth,” Bray said.
“We will expect a change of behaviour from them. If they don’t deal with it then we have the right and permission from teams to go public.”
This will also apply to referees.
The ruck will favour the attacking team
The tackler’s rights will no longer be deemed as being unlimited.
A tackler must released the tackled player and ball and get to their feet before scavenging.
Offenders will be approached by the country’s scrum coach
Teams, players and referees will be made aware of the issue
Media will be made aware of the repeat offenders
Filed under: Dan Cottrell, Rugby Team Management, Rugby Training | Tags: China, coaching around the world, player recruitment, rugby outposts
My name is Gean and I am a South African, I have been playing rugby my whole life but since I moved to China 3 years ago, it ended. About 2 years ago, I found a rugby club here in Hangzhou China; we always recruit players, as they do not stick around for long periods. I started to coach the forwards, as I am one of the skillful players and found your coaching tips very helpful, I just want to say thanks for your input and hope you can help us become a better team. Our team name is the Hangzhou Harlequins; you can look us up in google.
Filed under: Dan Cottrell, Rugby Fitness | Tags: conditioning, debate, fitness, The Huddle, weight training
There is no definitive answer, just read the debate in “The Huddle”
I think we can all agree that any training should take place in a safe and supervised environment, but what about the nature of what, how much and for how long?
I am no gym bunny myself though I can admit to an unhealthy obsession with a Concept 2 rowing machine.
However I did find “Rocket Rugby” helpful in explaining some programmes to players who asked.
Filed under: Dan Cottrell, Rugby Coaching, Rugby Skills | Tags: coaching, communication, drills, exercises, fun, intensity, training
As I look whimsically out of my window at the fog covering the snow capped hills outside Swansea, it is hard to remember a time when one of my teams actually played a game of rugby.
It has been a tough few months in the region, with terrible wet weather in November and December and then a bad cold snap that has covered the whole of the UK.
Amongst the gloom, the excitement of the Six Nations is brightening the rugby land, with players staking their claim to World Cup squad places. It won’t be long before we have Super 14 rugby as well.
But let’s forget thos bright lights for a moment and concentrate on our own rugby. Here are three ways I want my rugby to prosper:
1. Clearer instruction
Any exercise will be understood quicker because I have communicated what I want more effectively. I will pander to all the learning styles.
2. More intensity
I will identify exact moments when exercises and drills will be more intense and make sure that the players respond. Short bursts of high intensity.
3. More fun
Following on from last year, I will introduce more games and competitions into training.
Now to action it. I can’t wait.
Filed under: Dan Cottrell, Rugby Training | Tags: indoor training, snow, training in adverse conditions
In the Northern Hemisphere we are trapped in a terrible cold snap. Most games are cancelled and only the hardy few have managed to get outdoors for training.
Here are some ideas for training in the snow:
1. Don’t. It’s too cold, too unpleasant and what can your players learn? A team building snowball fight is the best option.
2. Train indoors. Every local facility will be quickly booked up, but have you thought of equestrian centres, who often have sand schools.
3. Classroom training. Take the time to plan out the rest of the season, solve tactical problems, set targets, suggest goals, discuss moves. You can do some video analysis or watch DVDs of games and talk about how you might replicate this style of play.
However, what most players miss is the physical contact side of things. Gyms and halls don’t allow full on contact. How about organising a pool session where you can play rugby waterpolo, or see if you can get down to the local martial arts club.
Keep the players in the loop on when and where everything will take place. Some find this the perfect excuse to slow down on training and miss the first few sessions back when the snow clears. Keep a close eye on them.
Filed under: Better Rugby Blog Guests, Dan Cottrell, Rugby News | Tags: Brendon Ventor, refereeing the contact area, ruck laws, rucking, Stephen Jones, Sunday Times
Here is what Stephen Jones, a Smart Session user and main rugby writer for Sunday Times has to comment on the matter.
THE ROLLING MAUL
Stephen Jones debates the biggest issues in rugby union in his weekly e-mail
Wednesday, January 6, 2010. 1630 BST
Brendan Venter, the Saracens coach, had the air of a man on a mission as he took his seat in the media room at Vicarage Road last Saturday evening. His breathtaking 40-minute assault on the mess of the laws at the breakdown, the random interpretations, the frustrations, the lack of incentive for teams to attack – all of it was perfectly judged.
Frankly, I cannot bring myself to condemn him because his verbals were not contained in some hoary procedure laid down by the Rugby Football Union. Why should such matters be contained behind closed doors when they affect so many tens of thousands of people who form the paying and watching public? Are we supposed to banish from the debate the 14,000 people who went to watch the Saracens-Leicester match and witnessed such sporting poverty?
But as the debate rages on, let’s just take aim at one of Venter’s targets. Never mind about demanding that coaches shut up. What about demanding that referees shut up too? Venter savaged the fact that every player killing the play at the breakdown gets too many chances.
Under the guise of communication and preventative refereeing, the official issues a final warning – number one, roll away; number two, hands off the ball; number three, back onside. It is only if the offender refuses to comply with the referee’s instructions that he may be penalised. I recall one appalling case when a Munster forward was killing a ruck in a match against Clermont Auvergne and the official told the forward five times (repeat, five times) to roll away.
As Venter says, once the ball has been killed for just a second, even if the miscreant reacts to the referee’s warning, the ball has been slowed down and the defence is back in position.
Just as an experiment, why don’t refereeing officials tell their men to wrap up and to penalise the offence, without warning, as soon as it is committed. To hell with preventative refereeing, it is a cheats’ charter.
Referees, this is your final warning!
Here are the top five complaints contained in Brendan Venter’s assault on refereeing and the laws of the game, made last weekend (due to a space shortage, we have only been able to include a fraction of his complaints!)
1 . The lottery at the breakdown – Venter’s view, understandably, is that, instead of consistent refereeing we get a random and even alternate series of penalties, with referees choosing one from around 27 offences.
2 . Refereeing officials often agree with the coaches, not the referees. Venter revealed that, on at least two occasions this season when he has complained about refereeing of Saracens matches, he has been visited by officials from Twickenham, who have agreed that he had grounds for complaint.
3 . Venter believes, again quite correctly, that the incessant barking and shouting from referees to try to stop players offending is in fact a blatant cheats’ charter, giving all the killers of the ball two opportunities to desist.
4. He believes that the problem is chiefly an English one and that there is more consistency in the Super 14. Here, we can safely and completely part company with him, as all the problems he outlined are very much universal.
5 . He says that referees are not attentive enough to their duties in preparing for games. “We would study the last five games of our opponents,” he says. “So why should referees not be expected to watch at least the last three games that the two teams have played before they come along?”
Filed under: Dan Cottrell, ELVs, Rugby News | Tags: Brendon Ventor, ruck, ruck laws, the breakdown, Toby Booth
There is a debate amongst the English premiership coaches over the interpretation of the ruck laws. Brendon Ventor, the Saracens coach, has been censored by RFU for his comments on how referees are not controlling the breakdown area.
He has found some support, but not from all parts. Toby Booth, the London Irish coach, says put up and get on with it. Deal with the situation and play rugby.
There are over 30 offences that can happen around the tackle area. With the speed of the game as it is, plus players aiming to play on or over the edge of the law, there is some sympathy for the referee.
However, this does not make it easy to play or coach. Witness a top level coaching session and the ethics of the law seem to be on hold.
At lower levels, everything is perhaps worse. Poorer quality of everything leads to a mess which could envelope the game and remove it from its first priniciples. Can we cope with this, or does the IRB need to revisit the ruck law again?